产品管理三角模型

Over the past 20 years of being in or near product management roles, I noticed that people’s understanding of product management and product marketing were varied. Two people might be discussing product marketing, yet have completely different views of what that role should accomplish. Part of this confusion was failing to understand that the role has many different responsibilities, with the three main areas being the strategy, marketing and technical domains. Discussing the edges of the PM triangle model should help better define the specialty aspects of product marketing and product management – overall.

Featured image

In our last post we discussed the corners of the Product Management (PM) triangle model. Each of the corners defines a focused specialty of the profession. Shown in the first Triangle, the technically focused PM is aptly called a Technical PM, the marketing corner focused PM is Tactical Product Marketing, and the strategy corner is the Product Strategist. In the field, the Technical PM role is common, the Product Strategist role may exist for very large corporations which warrants a highly focused individual or team, and the Tactical Product Marketing role may be generalized to a pure marketing role, like a Marketing Specialist, or Marketing Manager.

To repeat an earlier thought, people working on a branch of product management usually take on two main corners of focus in the PM Triangle. In effect, their role defines each edge of the triangle

Technical Strategy: The Product Owner (PO)

Featured image

The right edge is defined by the technical and strategy corners. Product Management is best known for this edge of the triangle. This edge is Agile Development’s definition of a Product Owner. On this edge, the PM focuses on defining the overall product, details, working mechanisms, defines user stories and cases (how will a user use a feature), and guides the development team of scientists, engineers or programmers. This role owns the responsibility of defining the product, features, and evolution. Toward the strategic end the Product Owner works to define the future migration path, new features, modules and add-ons, and is responsible for both the short and long term future roadmap of the product or service. As shown on the PM Triangle titles such as Strategic Product Manager, Roadmap Architect, and Technical Strategist help define the Product Owner edge.

Technical Marketing: The Technical Product Marketer (TPM)

Featured image

Our second bottom edge is straddled by marketing and technical domains. For these roles a PM is called to both deliver on driving the technical product definition, and guide the development teams for the short and immediate term product evolution – and drive the product focused marketing needed to launch, and sell the product in market. Success on this edge is particularly challenging given the need to balance between the business needs of driving the product’s market presence and sales efforts; and the technical needs of leading the development efforts. In practice, Technical Product Marketer’s both engage the technical teams and must be aware of all the detailed technical features and workings of the product, and they must also be business savvy – to drive marketing efforts (often creating them), engage clients directly on sales calls, product demonstrations and new product definitions. In most firms this person is perceived as the ultimate product expert. Technical Product Marketers are often called Product Marketing, Technical Product Marketing, Technical Market Planning, and often just Product Management.

Marketing Strategy:  Strategic Product Marketing (SPM)

Featured image

Our final edge defines the product centric marketing-strategy roles. This edge involves defining the business plan for the product/service (4P’s), the Go To Market (GTM) plan, buying persona’s, launch planning, market facing roadmap, defining the customer buying journey, selling strategy, sales enablement, product focused – marketing plan, and ownership of driving the overall business for the product, category or service. Success on this edge depends on targeting the right markets for the product, focusing the sales and marketing efforts on the right markets, and making the buying journey as easy and intuitive as possible for the client. This edge of getting and selling the product to the market successfully, is the core essence of business. Unlike pure tactical product marketing which is content focused, this edge adds broader business considerations, and involves creating the marketing strategy for how to bring a target market through the marketing and sales model stages – from awareness to purchase and advocacy. As shown on the PM triangle titles on this edge include Digital Product Marketing, Category Management, Business Management, and Strategic Product Marketing.

Product Management’s Full Domain

A complete view of the PM Triangle is this final diagram. Here we see the various titles defining the concentration of each role. With better definition of the various roles in Product Management, we should be able to reduce some of the role confusion experienced in the field. In mid to large organisations, it is especially important to identify functional gaps – by using a model like the PM Triangle. A product manager’s role is diverse, and important to the success of a product and firm. The key points are to make sure to leverage that PM’s strengths, understand on which edge they focus, and make sure that each corner and edge is covered – to truly succeed in market.

转:Product Management at the Edges
http://strategyd.org/product-management-at-the-edges/

更多文章

业务架构学习群资料

D6.1 业务架构师的演变

随着业务架构学科的成熟,大多数组织都在招募越来越多的业务架构师。业务架构师的基本角色是什么?为什么有的业务架构实践成果,而有的失败?成功的业务架构师一旦掌握了自己的学科,他们会去哪里?在本文中,我们回答了其中一些核心问题,旨在为从业者、组织和整个业务架构学科提供业务架构演进和业务架构师角色的蓝图。

阅读更多»
星球资料

产品线工程

这是我2010年前在工作中学习和实践产品线工程时写的一些文字,如果你在做to-B产品,想要规模化你的软件,可以了解一下。

阅读更多»
星球资料

一致性溢价 The Coherence Premium

专注于自己最擅长的事情的公司可以获得可持续的卓越回报。事实就是这么简单,但要内化却非常困难。在为每个业务部门和产品线做出每项运营决策时,确实很少有公司专注于“我们做得比任何人都好”。更罕见的是将其差异化的内部能力与正确的外部市场地位相结合的公司。我们称这些公司为“一致的”。

我们并不是建议公司无视市场信号;所有战略都是在这一重要背景下制定的。然而,我们建议公司从相反的方向开始,弄清楚他们真正擅长什么,然后开发这些能力(最多三到六个),直到它们成为一流的和互锁的。从那时起,战略就变成了将独特的能力系统与正确的市场机会相结合的问题 – 市场会以巨大的收益回报他们。我们称之为“一致性溢价”,我们已经对其进行了测量。

阅读更多»