模式:通过业务能力上下文分解

Pattern: Decompose by business capability Context

You are developing a large, complex application and want to use the microservice architecture. The microservice architecture structures an application as a set of loosely coupled services. The goal of the microservice architecture is to accelerate software development by enabling continuous delivery/deployment.

The microservice architecture does this in two ways:

  1. Simplifies testing and enables components to deployed independently
  2. Structures the engineering organization as a collection of small (6-10 members), autonomous teams, each of which is responsible for one or more services

These benefits are not automatically guaranteed. Instead, they can only be achieved by the careful functional decomposition of the application into services.

A service must be small enough to be developed by a small team and to be easily tested. A useful guideline from object-oriented design (OOD) is the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). The SRP defines a responsibility of a class as a reason to change, and states that a class should only have one reason to change. It make sense to apply the SRP to service design as well and design services that are cohesive and implement a small set of strongly related functions.

The application also be decomposed in a way so that most new and changed requirements only affect a single service. That is because changes that affect multiple services requires coordination across multiple teams, which slows down development. Another useful principle from OOD is the Common Closure Principle (CCP), which states that classes that change for the same reason should be in the same package. Perhaps, for instance, two classes implement different aspects of the same business rule. The goal is that when that business rule changes developers, only need to change code in a small number – ideally only one – of packages. This kind of thinking makes sense when designing services since it will help ensure that each change should impact only one service.

Problem

How to decompose an application into services?

Forces

  • The architecture must be stable
  • Services must be cohesive. A service should implement a small set of strongly related functions.
  • Services must conform to the Common Closure Principle – things that change together should be packaged together – to ensure that each change affect only one service
  • Services must be loosely coupled – each service as an API that encapsulates its implementation. The implementation can be changed without affecting clients
  • A service should be testable
  • Each service be small enough to be developed by a “two pizza” team, i.e. a team of 6-10 people
  • Each team that owns one or more services must be autonomous. A team must be able to develop and deploy their services with minimal collaboration with other teams.

Solution

Define services corresponding to business capabilities. A business capability is a concept from business architecture modeling. It is something that a business does in order to generate value. A business capability often corresponds to a business object, e.g.

  • Order Management is responsible for orders
  • Customer Management is responsible for customers

Business capabilities are often organized into a multi-level hierarchy. For example, an enterprise application might have top-level categories such as Product/Service developmentProduct/Service deliveryDemand generation, etc.

Examples

The business capabilities of an online store include:

  • Product catalog management
  • Inventory management
  • Order management
  • Delivery management

The corresponding microservice architecture would have services corresponding to each of these capabilities.

Resulting Context

This pattern has the following benefits:

  • Stable architecture since the business capabilities are relatively stable
  • Development teams are cross-functional, autonomous, and organized around delivering business value rather than technical features
  • Services are cohesive and loosely coupled

Issues

There are the following issues to address:

  • How to identify business capabilities? Identifying business capabilities and hence services requires an understanding of the business. An organization’s business capabilities are identified by analyzing the organization’s purpose, structure, business processes, and areas of expertise. Bounded contexts are best identified using an iterative process. Good starting points for identifying business capabilities are:
    • organization structure – different groups within an organization might correspond to business capabilities or business capability groups.
    • high-level domain model – business capabilities often correspond to domain objects
摘自《BangEA实践公开课》讲义
摘自《BangEA实践公开课》讲义

转:https://microservices.io/patterns/decomposition/decompose-by-business-capability.html

更多文章

星球资料

软件产品线实战

十年前做技术架构师时关注软件产品线工程,这本书当时对我帮助比较大,最近做一个相关内训再次翻到这本书,推荐给大家。

阅读更多»
EA免费资料

数字颠覆中的企业架构

在最近一次采访中,Target公司架构副总裁Joel Crabb说:“大架构时代已经终结了” 。他说,他曾经让猎头在数字化企业找可以招聘的企业架构师。他发现NetflixR和Facebook都没有企业架构师,虽然Amazon雇了很多架构师帮助客户把系统迁移到AWS。Joel Crabb说企业架构正在被去中间化。专业或领域架构师在敏捷团队和其他角色之间形成了一个无用层。例如,如果领导敏捷团队的产品经理来自业务部门并且被授权做真正的业务决策,业务架构师还有什么价值呢?这是否意味着企业架构已死?Joel Crabb并不这么想。

阅读更多»